# CI/CD Компоненты: Сравнение, Альтернативы и Обоснование выбора

**Версия:** 1.0  
**Дата:** Январь 2026  
**Целевая аудитория:** Technical Architects, DevOps Team, Management  
**Статус:** Decision Document

---

## Executive Summary

### Рекомендованный Stack для FinTech

| Компонент | Продукт | License | Annual Cost | Обоснование |
|-----------|---------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| **Git Repository** | Gitea | MIT | $0 | Lightweight, full-featured, zero cost |
| **CI Server** | Jenkins | MIT | $0 | Industry standard, 1800+ plugins |
| **GitOps** | ArgoCD/Custom | Apache 2.0 | $0 | Best GitOps, audit trail |
| **Container Registry** | Harbor | Apache 2.0 | $0 | Security scanning built-in |
| **Orchestration UI** | Portainer CE | Zlib | $0 | User-friendly, RBAC |
| **TOTAL** | | | **$0** | **vs $6,720 commercial stack** |

---

## Содержание

1. [Git Repository: Gitea vs Alternatives](#git-repository-gitea)
2. [CI Server: Jenkins vs Alternatives](#ci-server-jenkins)
3. [GitOps: ArgoCD vs Alternatives](#gitops-argocd)
4. [Container Registry: Harbor vs Alternatives](#container-registry-harbor)
5. [Orchestration UI: Portainer vs Alternatives](#orchestration-ui-portainer)
6. [Cost Comparison](#cost-comparison)

---

## Git Repository: Gitea

### Функциональность

**Core Features:**
- Git repository hosting (unlimited repos)
- Pull Request workflow + code review
- Issues + Projects (Kanban)
- Wiki documentation
- Branch protection rules
- Webhooks для CI integration
- LDAP/AD authentication
- GPG commit signing
- Git LFS support

**Performance:**
- RAM usage: 200-500 MB
- Single Go binary (50-100 MB)
- Fast startup (<5 seconds)
- SQLite/PostgreSQL/MySQL support

### Альтернативы

| Feature | Gitea | GitLab CE | GitHub Enterprise | Bitbucket |
|---------|-------|-----------|-------------------|-----------|
| **Cost** | FREE | FREE | $21/user/mo | $30/user/mo |
| **RAM** | 200 MB | 4+ GB | 2+ GB | 1-2 GB |
| **Setup** | 5 min | 30-60 min | 60+ min | 30 min |
| **Built-in CI** | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| **Lightweight** | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ |

### Почему Gitea?

✅ **Zero cost** - критично для budget  
✅ **Lightweight** - 200 MB RAM vs 4+ GB GitLab  
✅ **Simple** - single binary, easy upgrade  
✅ **Full-featured** - все нужное для Git workflow  
✅ **LDAP ready** - corporate authentication  

**Use GitLab instead if:**
- Need integrated CI/CD (without Jenkins)
- Team already knows GitLab
- Can allocate 8+ GB RAM

---

## CI Server: Jenkins

### Функциональность

**Core Features:**
- Pipeline as Code (Jenkinsfile)
- 1800+ plugins ecosystem
- Distributed builds (master-agent)
- Docker/Kubernetes integration
- LDAP/AD + RBAC
- Credentials management
- Audit trail
- Blue Ocean modern UI

**Plugin Examples:**
```
Security:
├─ OWASP Dependency Check
├─ SonarQube Scanner
├─ Trivy Container Scanner
└─ Snyk Security

Integrations:
├─ Gitea Plugin
├─ Docker Plugin
├─ Kubernetes Plugin
├─ Slack Notification
└─ Email Extension

Quality:
├─ JUnit Test Results
├─ Code Coverage (JaCoCo)
├─ Warnings Next Generation
└─ Performance Plugin
```

### Альтернативы

| Feature | Jenkins | GitLab CI | GitHub Actions | Drone |
|---------|---------|-----------|----------------|-------|
| **Cost** | FREE | FREE | Cloud/Self-hosted | FREE |
| **Plugins** | 1800+ | Limited | Marketplace | ~100 |
| **Flexibility** | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| **Learning Curve** | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
| **Git Agnostic** | ✅ | ❌ GitLab only | ❌ GitHub only | ✅ |

### Pipeline Example

```groovy
pipeline {
    agent { docker { image 'maven:3.8-openjdk-17' } }
    
    stages {
        stage('Build') {
            steps {
                sh 'mvn clean package'
            }
        }
        
        stage('Test') {
            parallel {
                stage('Unit Tests') {
                    steps { sh 'mvn test' }
                }
                stage('Security Scan') {
                    steps { sh 'mvn dependency-check:check' }
                }
            }
        }
        
        stage('Docker Build') {
            steps {
                sh 'docker build -t app:${BUILD_NUMBER} .'
            }
        }
        
        stage('Push to Harbor') {
            steps {
                sh 'docker push harbor.local/app:${BUILD_NUMBER}'
            }
        }
    }
}
```

### Почему Jenkins?

✅ **Industry standard** - 70% Fortune 500 use it  
✅ **Plugin ecosystem** - 1800+ plugins  
✅ **Proven in FinTech** - JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank  
✅ **Flexibility** - Pipeline as Code  
✅ **Git agnostic** - works with Gitea, GitLab, etc.  

**Use GitLab CI instead if:**
- Using GitLab as Git provider
- Need simpler YAML syntax
- Want all-in-one platform

---

## GitOps: ArgoCD / Custom

### ArgoCD (для Kubernetes)

**Features:**
- Declarative GitOps
- Automatic sync from Git
- Web UI (topology view)
- Multi-cluster support
- SSO (OIDC, LDAP)
- Rollback capabilities
- Audit logging

**Альтернативы:**
- **Flux CD** - no UI, CLI-first
- **Jenkins X** - very opinionated
- **Spinnaker** - complex, multi-cloud

### Custom GitOps Operator (для Docker Swarm)

**Why custom для Swarm:**
- ArgoCD designed для K8s
- Swarm simpler - custom operator = 200 lines Python
- Full control, easy maintenance

**Implementation:**

```python
# gitops-swarm-operator.py
import time, subprocess
from git import Repo

class GitOpsOperator:
    def __init__(self, repo_url, local_path):
        self.repo = Repo.clone_from(repo_url, local_path)
    
    def sync_loop(self, interval=30):
        while True:
            self.repo.remotes.origin.pull()
            
            for compose_file in Path(self.local_path).rglob('docker-compose.yml'):
                stack_name = compose_file.parent.name
                subprocess.run([
                    'docker', 'stack', 'deploy',
                    '-c', str(compose_file),
                    stack_name
                ])
            
            time.sleep(interval)
```

### Почему ArgoCD/Custom?

**Kubernetes:** ArgoCD  
✅ Best-in-class UI  
✅ Strong RBAC  
✅ Audit trail  

**Docker Swarm:** Custom  
✅ Simple (200 lines)  
✅ Lightweight (50 MB RAM)  
✅ Easy troubleshooting  

---

## Container Registry: Harbor

### Функциональность

**Core Features:**
- Docker Registry v2 API
- Vulnerability scanning (Trivy)
- Image signing (Notary/Cosign)
- RBAC (project-level)
- LDAP/AD integration
- Replication
- Webhook notifications
- Audit logging

**Security Workflow:**
```
Push Image → Harbor
     │
     ├──> Trivy Scan
     │    ├─ OS vulnerabilities
     │    └─ App dependencies
     │
     ├──> Policy Check
     │    ├─ CRITICAL CVEs? → ❌ Block
     │    ├─ HIGH CVEs? → ⚠️ Warn
     │    └─ MEDIUM/LOW → ✅ Allow
     │
     └──> Notification
          └─ Slack/Email
```

### Альтернативы

| Feature | Harbor | Docker Registry | Nexus | Artifactory |
|---------|--------|-----------------|-------|-------------|
| **Cost** | FREE | FREE | FREE (limited) | $3K+/year |
| **UI** | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| **Vuln Scan** | ✅ Trivy | ❌ | ⚠️ Paid | ✅ |
| **Signing** | ✅ | ❌ | ⚠️ Paid | ✅ |
| **RBAC** | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |

### Почему Harbor?

✅ **Security built-in** - Trivy scanning included  
✅ **Compliance-ready** - audit logs, signing  
✅ **Enterprise RBAC** - project-level permissions  
✅ **Zero cost** - vs $3K+ Artifactory  

**Use Nexus instead if:**
- Need multi-format (Maven, npm, PyPI)
- Already using Sonatype tools

---

## Orchestration UI: Portainer

### Функциональность

**Core Features:**
- Docker Swarm native support
- Modern Web UI
- Stack deployment (Compose)
- RBAC + Teams
- LDAP/AD integration
- Container logs streaming
- Resource monitoring
- Template library

**RBAC Example:**
```
Teams:
├── DevOps (Admin)
│   └─ Full access
├── Developers
│   └─ Deploy to dev only
├── QA
│   └─ Deploy to staging
└── Managers
    └─ View-only
```

### Альтернативы

| Feature | Portainer CE | Swarmpit | Docker CLI | Rancher |
|---------|--------------|----------|------------|---------|
| **Cost** | FREE | FREE | FREE | FREE |
| **UI** | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Good | ❌ | ✅ Excellent |
| **RBAC** | ✅ | ⚠️ Basic | ❌ | ✅ |
| **LDAP** | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| **Swarm Focus** | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ K8s focus |

### Почему Portainer?

✅ **User-friendly** - non-DevOps can deploy  
✅ **RBAC** - compliance-ready access control  
✅ **Free** - CE version has all needed features  
✅ **Audit trail** - who deployed what  

---

## Cost Comparison

### Recommended (Open Source)

```
Gitea:          $0
Jenkins:        $0
ArgoCD/Custom:  $0
Harbor:         $0
Portainer CE:   $0
───────────────────
TOTAL:          $0/year

Savings:        $6,720/year
```

### Alternative (Commercial)

```
GitHub Enterprise:  $2,520/year (10 users)
Bamboo CI:         $1,200/year
Spinnaker:         $0 (FOSS)
Artifactory:       $3,000/year
Rancher:           $0 (FOSS)
────────────────────────────────────
TOTAL:             $6,720/year
```

---

## Implementation Priority

**Week 1-2: Core**
1. Deploy Gitea + PostgreSQL
2. Deploy Harbor
3. Migrate existing repos

**Week 3-4: CI/CD**
4. Deploy Jenkins
5. Create first pipeline
6. Setup webhooks

**Week 5-6: GitOps**
7. Deploy ArgoCD/Custom
8. Deploy Portainer
9. End-to-end test

---

## Decision Matrix

### When to Choose Alternatives

**GitLab over Gitea:**
- ❓ Need integrated CI/CD
- ❓ Team knows GitLab
- ❓ Have 8+ GB RAM

**GitHub Actions over Jenkins:**
- ❓ Using GitHub (not on-prem)
- ❓ Simple workflows only

**Artifactory over Harbor:**
- ❓ Need multi-format registry
- ❓ Budget allows $3K+/year

**Rancher over Portainer:**
- ❓ Multiple clusters
- ❓ Heavy K8s focus

---

## Appendix: Quick Reference

### Component URLs

```
Gitea:     https://git.company.local
Jenkins:   https://jenkins.company.local
Harbor:    https://harbor.company.local
ArgoCD:    https://argocd.company.local
Portainer: https://portainer.company.local:9443
```

### Default Ports

```
Gitea:     3000 (HTTP), 22 (SSH)
Jenkins:   8080 (HTTP)
Harbor:    80/443 (HTTP/HTTPS)
ArgoCD:    8080 (HTTP), 8083 (gRPC)
Portainer: 9443 (HTTPS), 8000 (Edge)
```

---

**Document Version:** 1.0  
**Last Updated:** Январь 2026  
**Status:** Decision Document - Ready for Approval

**Approvals:**
- [ ] Technical Architect
- [ ] DevOps Lead
- [ ] Security Lead
- [ ] CTO